Dunning-Kruger Effect Explained: Why Incompetence Breeds Overconfidence

Why is it 90% of drivers consider themselves to be better than average, 65% of Americans believe they have above average intelligence and most of us believe we are more likable and honest than the average person?

To make sense of these mathematically impossible statistics, you have to know McArthur Wheeling One cold morning, MacArthur Wheeler walked into a bank in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and robbed it at gunpoint. A few hours later, he robbed another. Even more unusual? He wore no disguise or mask of any kind. His face was plainly visible and captured on surveillance videos of both robberies. An hour after the police released the video footage to air on the local nightly news, an informant who recognized Wheeler contacted the police. Wheeler was arrested the same day.

Robbing two banks in one day without a disguise isn’t what earned him the title of “World’s Dumbest Criminal.” During his interaction with the police, he was incredulous as to how he was caught. After all, he knew his chemistry. Wheeler knew that lemon juice could be used as invisible ink –you can write on paper with lemon juice, and it will be invisible until the paper is heated when the juice oxidizes and turns brown.

Applying the same logic, he believed that if he applied lemon juice to his face, he would be invisible (at least to the cameras) as long as he stayed cool. His rudimentary chemistry knowledge let to his arrogant confidence that he’d outwit the police and the disbelief that he was caught. “But I used the juice,” he said to the arresting policeman.

Cornell professor David Dunning caught the story in the 1996 edition of the World Almanac. He and his graduate student, Justin Kruger, recognized it as more than stupidity. They theorized that people who are ignorant or unskilled in a particular subject area tend to believe they are much more competent than they are.

Bad drivers believe they're good drivers, cheapskates think they are generous, and people with no leadership skills think they can rule the world. How hard can it be, right?

The Dunning-Kruger effect rests on the idea that we all have blind spots of incompetence, where confidence runs high even as knowledge or ability runs low. When we lack expertise, we’re prone to mistakes—but because we don’t know enough to recognize them, those mistakes often go unnoticed. This dynamic was formally introduced in the seminal 1999 paper Unskilled and Unaware of It by David Dunning and Justin Kruger.

In their studies, the researchers examined domains such as humor, grammar, and logical reasoning. What they discovered was striking: participants who scored in the bottom quartile consistently overestimated their performance and abilities. For example, in a grammar experiment, students were asked to compare their skill in recognizing standard English with that of their peers. Those scoring around the 10th percentile—meaning they performed better than only 10% of participants—estimated that their abilities ranked at roughly the 67th percentile.

And this pattern extends far beyond classrooms. A broad study of high-tech firms found that 32% of software engineers believed they were in the top 1% of talent within their company. At the University of Nebraska, a survey revealed that 68% of faculty members rated themselves in the top 25% for teaching ability, and nearly all—94%—considered themselves smarter than their peers.

Meanwhile, in a national poll, 21% of Americans said it was “very likely” or “fairly likely” they would become millionaires within the next decade. Taken together, these examples showcase a stunning trend: widespread overconfidence that blatantly defies statistical reality.

There is also a corollary to the effect. Just as highly incompetent people overestimate their abilities, highly competent tend to underestimate their abilities. Dunning and Kruger found that most people, regardless of how they perform on any given task, rate themselves at 7-8 out of 10.

“Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.” - Charles Darwin

It turns out with great knowledge, comes great confidence. And with no knowledge, comes great confidence. Those who have the slightest bit of experience think they know it all. Then, as people gain experience, they begin to realize how little they do know. This is the point at which they search out the knowledge they need and build their expertise. Those at the level of genius recognize their talent and demonstrate the confidence commensurate with their ability.

So, how can you overcome the Dunning-Kruger Effect? A good first step is recognizing that we are pretty bad at self-assessment. It's a skill that requires work.

The best second step may be to consider the following story:

A university professor went to visit a famous Zen master. While the master quietly served tea, the professor talked about Zen. The master poured the visitor’s cup to the brim, and then kept pouring. The professor watched the overflowing cup until he could no longer restrain himself. “It’s full! No more will go in!” the professor blurted. “This is you,” the master replied. “How can I show you Zen unless you first empty your cup?”

If you already know everything, it’s impossible to learn anything.

---

---